Match statistics snapshot
- Almere City FC created the clearer chances on xG (1.10 vs 0.56, Δ 0.54).
- Almere City FC fired more attempts (13 vs 8 shots).
- Groningen was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Groningen |
|---|---|---|
| 1.10Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.56 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Groningen |
|---|---|---|
| 27% | Ball possession | 73%Lead |
| 63% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 137 | Accurate passes | 501Lead |
| 217 | Total passes | 607Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Groningen |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Groningen |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -0.51 | Goals prevented | -0.51 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Groningen |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |