Match statistics snapshot
- Heerenveen created the clearer chances on xG (1.83 vs 1.96, Δ 0.13).
- Heerenveen fired more attempts (18 vs 13 shots).
- Heerenveen held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 1.83 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.96Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 76%Lead |
| 251 | Accurate passes | 342Lead |
| 366 | Total passes | 451Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.