Match statistics snapshot
- Heracles created the clearer chances on xG (1.06 vs 3.21, Δ 2.15).
- Heracles was more accurate in front of goal (35% on target vs 18%).
- Almere City FC held more of the ball (63% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Heracles |
|---|---|---|
| 1.06 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.21Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 17 | Total shots | 17 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Heracles |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 69%Lead | Pass accuracy | 57% |
| 337Lead | Accurate passes | 166 |
| 485Lead | Total passes | 291 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Heracles |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Heracles |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Heracles |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.