Match statistics snapshot
- Heracles created the clearer chances on xG (0.84 vs 1.03, Δ 0.19).
- Almere City FC fired more attempts (13 vs 10 shots).
- Heracles held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Heracles |
|---|---|---|
| 0.84 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.03Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Heracles |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 304 | Accurate passes | 405Lead |
| 392 | Total passes | 476Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Heracles |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Heracles |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| 0.23 | Goals prevented | 0.23 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Heracles |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.