Match statistics snapshot
- Almere City FC fired more attempts (15 vs 11 shots).
- Almere City FC was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 18%).
- Almere City FC held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Jong Utrecht |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 5 | Shots off target | 6Lead |
| 6Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Jong Utrecht |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 385Lead | Accurate passes | 310 |
| 455Lead | Total passes | 405 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Jong Utrecht |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Jong Utrecht |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Jong Utrecht |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |