Match statistics snapshot
- Almere City FC created the clearer chances on xG (0.69 vs 0.53, Δ 0.16).
- PEC Zwolle fired more attempts (13 vs 10 shots).
- PEC Zwolle was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Pec Zwolle |
|---|---|---|
| 0.69Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.53 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Pec Zwolle |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 77%Lead |
| 243 | Accurate passes | 354Lead |
| 364 | Total passes | 459Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Pec Zwolle |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Pec Zwolle |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Pec Zwolle |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.