Match statistics snapshot
- Almere City FC created the clearer chances on xG (3.17 vs 1.29, Δ 1.88).
- Almere City FC fired more attempts (24 vs 10 shots).
- PEC Zwolle was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Pec Zwolle |
|---|---|---|
| 3.17Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.29 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 18Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 14Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 24Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Pec Zwolle |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 77%Lead |
| 284 | Accurate passes | 303Lead |
| 383 | Total passes | 394Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Pec Zwolle |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Pec Zwolle |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| 0.87 | Goals prevented | 0.87 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Pec Zwolle |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.