Match statistics snapshot
- Utrecht created the clearer chances on xG (0.30 vs 1.35, Δ 1.05).
- Utrecht fired more attempts (12 vs 9 shots).
- Utrecht was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 11%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Utrecht |
|---|---|---|
| 0.30 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.35Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Utrecht |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 60%Lead | Pass accuracy | 59% |
| 206 | Accurate passes | 216Lead |
| 346 | Total passes | 369Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Utrecht |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Utrecht |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Utrecht |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |