Match statistics snapshot
- Utrecht created the clearer chances on xG (1.25 vs 1.57, Δ 0.32).
- Utrecht fired more attempts (12 vs 11 shots).
- Utrecht was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Utrecht |
|---|---|---|
| 1.25 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.57Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Utrecht |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 354 | Accurate passes | 358Lead |
| 439Lead | Total passes | 431 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Utrecht |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Utrecht |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -0.18 | Goals prevented | -0.18 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Utrecht |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |