Match statistics snapshot
- Almere City FC created the clearer chances on xG (1.89 vs 0.37, Δ 1.52).
- Almere City FC fired more attempts (11 vs 7 shots).
- Vitesse held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Vitesse |
|---|---|---|
| 1.89Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.37 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Vitesse |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 60% | Pass accuracy | 65%Lead |
| 185 | Accurate passes | 258Lead |
| 307 | Total passes | 396Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Vitesse |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Vitesse |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Vitesse |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 16Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.