Match statistics snapshot
- Athletic Club fired more attempts (13 vs 9 shots).
- Amazonas was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Athletic Club |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 1 | Shots off target |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Athletic Club |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 288 | Accurate passes | 319Lead |
| 355 | Total passes | 379Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Athletic Club |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Athletic Club |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Athletic Club |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | Fouls | 17Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.