Match statistics snapshot
- Amazonas created the clearer chances on xG (2.10 vs 0.60, Δ 1.50).
- Amazonas fired more attempts (16 vs 9 shots).
- Coritiba held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Coritiba |
|---|---|---|
| 2.10Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.60 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Coritiba |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 209 | Accurate passes | 311Lead |
| 286 | Total passes | 396Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Coritiba |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Coritiba |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Coritiba |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |