Match statistics snapshot
- Amazonas fired more attempts (16 vs 13 shots).
- Amazonas was more accurate in front of goal (31% on target vs 23%).
- Criciuma held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 61% | Pass accuracy | 75%Lead |
| 160 | Accurate passes | 258Lead |
| 261 | Total passes | 344Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 6 |