Match statistics snapshot
- Amazonas fired more attempts (16 vs 9 shots).
- Amazonas was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 11%).
- Amazonas held more of the ball (63% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Ferroviária |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 6 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 7 | Shots outside the box | 7 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Ferroviária |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 61% |
| 358Lead | Accurate passes | 163 |
| 452Lead | Total passes | 268 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Ferroviária |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Ferroviária |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Ferroviária |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |