Match statistics snapshot
- Goias created the clearer chances on xG (1.04 vs 1.40, Δ 0.36).
- Goias was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 30%).
- Amazonas held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Goias |
|---|---|---|
| 1.04 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.40Lead |
| 9 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Goias |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 278Lead | Accurate passes | 214 |
| 352Lead | Total passes | 283 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Goias |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Goias |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Goias |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |