Match statistics snapshot
- Amazonas created the clearer chances on xG (0.99 vs 0.72, Δ 0.27).
- Novorizontino fired more attempts (13 vs 8 shots).
- Novorizontino was more accurate in front of goal (23% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Novorizontino |
|---|---|---|
| 0.99Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.72 |
| Offsides | ||
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 10Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Novorizontino |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 346Lead | Accurate passes | 205 |
| 433Lead | Total passes | 294 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Novorizontino |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Novorizontino |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Novorizontino |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |