Match statistics snapshot
- Amazonas was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 8%).
- Operario-PR held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Operario-pr |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 7Lead |
| 4 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Operario-pr |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 179 | Accurate passes | 272Lead |
| 231 | Total passes | 333Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Operario-pr |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Operario-pr |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Operario-pr |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |