Match statistics snapshot
- Amazonas fired more attempts (19 vs 9 shots).
- Remo was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 16%).
- Amazonas held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 318Lead | Accurate passes | 188 |
| 386Lead | Total passes | 262 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Remo |
|---|---|---|
| 16Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |