Match statistics snapshot
- Amazonas created the clearer chances on xG (1.31 vs 0.99, Δ 0.32).
- Amazonas fired more attempts (20 vs 14 shots).
- Vila Nova was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Vila Nova |
|---|---|---|
| 1.31Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.99 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Vila Nova |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 373Lead | Accurate passes | 231 |
| 447Lead | Total passes | 315 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Vila Nova |
|---|---|---|
| 16Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Vila Nova |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Amazonas | Statistic | Vila Nova |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |