Match statistics snapshot
- Amazulu fired more attempts (12 vs 9 shots).
- Ajax Cape Town was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 33%).
- Amazulu held more of the ball (68% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Ajax Cape Town |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Ajax Cape Town |
|---|---|---|
| 68%Lead | Ball possession | 32% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 486Lead | Accurate passes | 190 |
| 573Lead | Total passes | 280 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Ajax Cape Town |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Ajax Cape Town |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Ajax Cape Town |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Fouls | 20 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.