Match statistics snapshot
- Amazulu fired more attempts (17 vs 13 shots).
- Amazulu was more accurate in front of goal (35% on target vs 23%).
- Cape Town City held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Cape Town City |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Cape Town City |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 242 | Accurate passes | 420Lead |
| 317 | Total passes | 504Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Cape Town City |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Cape Town City |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Cape Town City |
|---|---|---|
| 21 | Fouls | 15Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |