Match statistics snapshot
- Chippa United fired more attempts (14 vs 13 shots).
- Amazulu was more accurate in front of goal (23% on target vs 14%).
- Chippa United held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Chippa United |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 5 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Chippa United |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 280 | Accurate passes | 353Lead |
| 365 | Total passes | 439Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Chippa United |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Chippa United |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Chippa United |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.