Match statistics snapshot
- Amazulu fired more attempts (15 vs 8 shots).
- Amazulu was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 13%).
- Chippa United held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Chippa United |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Chippa United |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 293 | Accurate passes | 457Lead |
| 363 | Total passes | 538Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Chippa United |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Chippa United |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Chippa United |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |