Match statistics snapshot
- Orlando Pirates created the clearer chances on xG (1.03 vs 1.74, Δ 0.71).
- Orlando Pirates fired more attempts (24 vs 5 shots).
- Orlando Pirates was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Orlando Pirates |
|---|---|---|
| 1.03 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.74Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 17Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 24Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Orlando Pirates |
|---|---|---|
| 29% | Ball possession | 71%Lead |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 206 | Accurate passes | 637Lead |
| 286 | Total passes | 727Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Orlando Pirates |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Orlando Pirates |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 9Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| -0.05 | Goals prevented | -0.05 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Orlando Pirates |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 4Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |