Match statistics snapshot
- Richards Bay fired more attempts (13 vs 6 shots).
- Amazulu held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Richards Bay |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 3 | Shots off target |
| 1 | Shots on target | 2Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Richards Bay |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 362Lead | Accurate passes | 200 |
| 447Lead | Total passes | 284 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Richards Bay |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Richards Bay |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Richards Bay |
|---|---|---|
| 16Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.