Match statistics snapshot
- Amazulu fired more attempts (15 vs 11 shots).
- Amazulu was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Royal Am |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 6 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 3 | Shots off target |
| 8Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Royal Am |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 386Lead | Accurate passes | 344 |
| 471Lead | Total passes | 422 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Royal Am |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Royal Am |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Royal Am |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.