Match statistics snapshot
- Amazulu fired more attempts (15 vs 7 shots).
- Stellenbosch was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 20%).
- Amazulu held more of the ball (63% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Stellenbosch |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 10 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Stellenbosch |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 412Lead | Accurate passes | 208 |
| 484Lead | Total passes | 279 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Stellenbosch |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Stellenbosch |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Stellenbosch |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.