Match statistics snapshot
- Amazulu fired more attempts (16 vs 8 shots).
- TS Galaxy was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 38%).
- Amazulu held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Ts Galaxy |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Ts Galaxy |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 460Lead | Accurate passes | 244 |
| 531Lead | Total passes | 327 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Ts Galaxy |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Ts Galaxy |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Amazulu | Statistic | Ts Galaxy |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |