Match statistics snapshot
- Amed created the clearer chances on xG (3.58 vs 0.00, Δ 3.58).
- Amed fired more attempts (29 vs 1 shots).
- Amed was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Amed | Statistic | Adana Demirspor |
|---|---|---|
| 3.58Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.00 |
| 5 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 23Lead | Shots inside the box | 0 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 11Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 29Lead | Total shots | 1 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Amed | Statistic | Adana Demirspor |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 415Lead | Accurate passes | 290 |
| 481Lead | Total passes | 370 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Amed | Statistic | Adana Demirspor |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Amed | Statistic | Adana Demirspor |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Amed | Statistic | Adana Demirspor |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |