Match statistics snapshot
- Amed created the clearer chances on xG (3.19 vs 0.68, Δ 2.51).
- Amed fired more attempts (25 vs 10 shots).
- Amed was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 10%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Amed | Statistic | Boluspor |
|---|---|---|
| 3.19Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.68 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 20Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 11Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 25Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Amed | Statistic | Boluspor |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 368Lead | Accurate passes | 269 |
| 427Lead | Total passes | 332 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Amed | Statistic | Boluspor |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Amed | Statistic | Boluspor |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Amed | Statistic | Boluspor |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |