Match statistics snapshot
- Amed created the clearer chances on xG (2.48 vs 0.70, Δ 1.78).
- Amed fired more attempts (17 vs 6 shots).
- Esenler Erokspor was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 24%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Amed | Statistic | Esenler Erokspor |
|---|---|---|
| 2.48Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.70 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Amed | Statistic | Esenler Erokspor |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 350Lead | Accurate passes | 242 |
| 429Lead | Total passes | 332 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Amed | Statistic | Esenler Erokspor |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Amed | Statistic | Esenler Erokspor |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Amed | Statistic | Esenler Erokspor |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |