Match statistics snapshot
- Amed created the clearer chances on xG (3.02 vs 1.21, Δ 1.81).
- Amed fired more attempts (20 vs 6 shots).
- Hatayspor was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Amed | Statistic | Hatayspor |
|---|---|---|
| 3.02Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.21 |
| 5 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Amed | Statistic | Hatayspor |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 349 | Accurate passes | 396Lead |
| 406 | Total passes | 467Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Amed | Statistic | Hatayspor |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Amed | Statistic | Hatayspor |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Amed | Statistic | Hatayspor |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 8 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |