Match statistics snapshot
- Amed fired more attempts (8 vs 5 shots).
- Amed was more accurate in front of goal (75% on target vs 60%).
- Iğdır FK held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Amed | Statistic | Iğdır Fk |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 2 |
| 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 2Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Amed | Statistic | Iğdır Fk |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 297 | Accurate passes | 378Lead |
| 375 | Total passes | 457Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Amed | Statistic | Iğdır Fk |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Amed | Statistic | Iğdır Fk |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Amed | Statistic | Iğdır Fk |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |