Match statistics snapshot
- Amed fired more attempts (17 vs 9 shots).
- İstanbulspor was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 18%).
- Amed held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Amed | Statistic | İstanbulspor |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 10 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Amed | Statistic | İstanbulspor |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 374Lead | Accurate passes | 260 |
| 445Lead | Total passes | 330 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Amed | Statistic | İstanbulspor |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Amed | Statistic | İstanbulspor |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Amed | Statistic | İstanbulspor |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |