Match statistics snapshot
- Amed created the clearer chances on xG (2.01 vs 0.13, Δ 1.88).
- Amed fired more attempts (23 vs 5 shots).
- Amed was more accurate in front of goal (35% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Amed | Statistic | Manisa F.k. |
|---|---|---|
| 2.01Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.13 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 0 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 23Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Amed | Statistic | Manisa F.k. |
|---|---|---|
| 67%Lead | Ball possession | 33% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 380Lead | Accurate passes | 178 |
| 467Lead | Total passes | 247 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Amed | Statistic | Manisa F.k. |
|---|---|---|
| 17Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Amed | Statistic | Manisa F.k. |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Amed | Statistic | Manisa F.k. |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 5 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |