Match statistics snapshot
- Amed fired more attempts (12 vs 7 shots).
- Amed was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 14%).
- Amed held more of the ball (70% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Amed | Statistic | Pendikspor |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 4 |
| 5Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Amed | Statistic | Pendikspor |
|---|---|---|
| 70%Lead | Ball possession | 30% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 554Lead | Accurate passes | 209 |
| 622Lead | Total passes | 271 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Amed | Statistic | Pendikspor |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Amed | Statistic | Pendikspor |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Amed | Statistic | Pendikspor |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |