Match statistics snapshot
- Amed fired more attempts (13 vs 5 shots).
- Amed was more accurate in front of goal (54% on target vs 40%).
- Amed held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Amed | Statistic | Sakaryaspor |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 3Lead |
| 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Amed | Statistic | Sakaryaspor |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 69% |
| 382Lead | Accurate passes | 214 |
| 456Lead | Total passes | 309 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Amed | Statistic | Sakaryaspor |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Amed | Statistic | Sakaryaspor |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Amed | Statistic | Sakaryaspor |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.