Match statistics snapshot
- Amed created the clearer chances on xG (2.39 vs 0.84, Δ 1.55).
- Amed fired more attempts (17 vs 8 shots).
- Trabzonspor was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 41%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Amed | Statistic | Trabzonspor |
|---|---|---|
| 2.39Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.84 |
| 4 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Amed | Statistic | Trabzonspor |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 275 | Accurate passes | 448Lead |
| 352 | Total passes | 525Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Amed | Statistic | Trabzonspor |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Amed | Statistic | Trabzonspor |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| 0.75 | Goals prevented | 0.75 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Amed | Statistic | Trabzonspor |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |