Match statistics snapshot
- Amed created the clearer chances on xG (1.93 vs 0.44, Δ 1.49).
- Amed fired more attempts (14 vs 7 shots).
- Vanspor FK was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Amed | Statistic | Vanspor Fk |
|---|---|---|
| 1.93Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.44 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Amed | Statistic | Vanspor Fk |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 383Lead | Accurate passes | 247 |
| 462Lead | Total passes | 328 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Amed | Statistic | Vanspor Fk |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Amed | Statistic | Vanspor Fk |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Amed | Statistic | Vanspor Fk |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |