Match statistics snapshot
- Celta Vigo fired more attempts (15 vs 10 shots).
- Amorebieta was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 27%).
- Celta Vigo held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Amorebieta | Statistic | Celta Vigo |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Amorebieta | Statistic | Celta Vigo |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 62% | Pass accuracy | 68%Lead |
| 199 | Accurate passes | 266Lead |
| 321 | Total passes | 391Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Amorebieta | Statistic | Celta Vigo |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Amorebieta | Statistic | Celta Vigo |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Amorebieta | Statistic | Celta Vigo |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |