Match statistics snapshot
- Anderlecht created the clearer chances on xG (1.23 vs 1.03, Δ 0.20).
- Cercle Brugge fired more attempts (19 vs 7 shots).
- Anderlecht was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 37%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Anderlecht | Statistic | Cercle Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| 1.23Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.03 |
| 3Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Anderlecht | Statistic | Cercle Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 66% | Pass accuracy | 66% |
| 268Lead | Accurate passes | 260 |
| 409Lead | Total passes | 392 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Anderlecht | Statistic | Cercle Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 12Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Anderlecht | Statistic | Cercle Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Anderlecht | Statistic | Cercle Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.