Match statistics snapshot
- Angel City W fired more attempts (12 vs 11 shots).
- Angel City W was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 0%).
- Angel City W held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Angel City W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 5 |
| 8Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Angel City W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 68%Lead | Pass accuracy | 64% |
| 270Lead | Accurate passes | 208 |
| 396Lead | Total passes | 326 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Angel City W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Angel City W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Angel City W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.