Match statistics snapshot
- Angel City W fired more attempts (21 vs 10 shots).
- Angel City W was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 30%).
- Houston Dash W held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Angel City W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Angel City W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 74%Lead |
| 196 | Accurate passes | 273Lead |
| 287 | Total passes | 371Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Angel City W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Angel City W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Angel City W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.