Match statistics snapshot
- Houston Dash W created the clearer chances on xG (1.33 vs 1.98, Δ 0.65).
- Houston Dash W fired more attempts (15 vs 9 shots).
- Angel City W was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Angel City W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| 1.33 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.98Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 10Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Angel City W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 73%Lead | Pass accuracy | 64% |
| 242Lead | Accurate passes | 195 |
| 333Lead | Total passes | 303 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Angel City W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Angel City W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Angel City W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| 21 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |