Match statistics snapshot
- Angel City W fired more attempts (26 vs 14 shots).
- Racing Louisville W was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 23%).
- Angel City W held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Angel City W | Statistic | Racing Louisville W |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 6 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 7 |
|---|
| 26Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Angel City W | Statistic | Racing Louisville W |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 60% |
| 330Lead | Accurate passes | 139 |
| 414Lead | Total passes | 231 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Angel City W | Statistic | Racing Louisville W |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Angel City W | Statistic | Racing Louisville W |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 5 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Angel City W | Statistic | Racing Louisville W |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 6 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |