Match statistics snapshot
- Utah Royals W fired more attempts (21 vs 14 shots).
- Utah Royals W was more accurate in front of goal (48% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Angel City W | Statistic | Utah Royals W |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 4 | Shots off target |
| 4 | Shots on target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 12Lead |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 21Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Angel City W | Statistic | Utah Royals W |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 348 | Accurate passes | 361Lead |
| 428Lead | Total passes | 421 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Angel City W | Statistic | Utah Royals W |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Angel City W | Statistic | Utah Royals W |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 9Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Angel City W | Statistic | Utah Royals W |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |