Match statistics snapshot
- Nea Salamis created the clearer chances on xG (0.72 vs 1.18, Δ 0.46).
- Nea Salamis fired more attempts (14 vs 7 shots).
- Anorthosis was more accurate in front of goal (71% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Anorthosis | Statistic | Nea Salamis |
|---|---|---|
| 0.72 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.18Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Anorthosis | Statistic | Nea Salamis |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 368Lead | Accurate passes | 303 |
| 435Lead | Total passes | 365 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Anorthosis | Statistic | Nea Salamis |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Anorthosis | Statistic | Nea Salamis |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Anorthosis | Statistic | Nea Salamis |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 13 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |