Match statistics snapshot
- Cobresal fired more attempts (13 vs 8 shots).
- Cobresal was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 13%).
- Cobresal held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Antofagasta | Statistic | Cobresal |
|---|---|---|
| Offsides | ||
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 5 | Shots off target | 5 |
| 1 | Shots on target |
| 5Lead |
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Antofagasta | Statistic | Cobresal |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 338 | Accurate passes | 397Lead |
| 397 | Total passes | 467Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Antofagasta | Statistic | Cobresal |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Antofagasta | Statistic | Cobresal |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Antofagasta | Statistic | Cobresal |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.