Match statistics snapshot
- Antwerp created the clearer chances on xG (1.34 vs 0.57, Δ 0.77).
- Antwerp fired more attempts (15 vs 8 shots).
- Antwerp was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Antwerp | Statistic | Cercle Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| 1.34Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.57 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Antwerp | Statistic | Cercle Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 67%Lead | Pass accuracy | 62% |
| 272Lead | Accurate passes | 191 |
| 404Lead | Total passes | 309 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Antwerp | Statistic | Cercle Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Antwerp | Statistic | Cercle Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Antwerp | Statistic | Cercle Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |