Match statistics snapshot
- Antwerp created the clearer chances on xG (1.17 vs 0.55, Δ 0.62).
- Antwerp was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 40%).
- Club Brugge KV held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Antwerp | Statistic | Club Brugge Kv |
|---|---|---|
| 1.17Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.55 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Antwerp | Statistic | Club Brugge Kv |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 349 | Accurate passes | 467Lead |
| 418 | Total passes | 541Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Antwerp | Statistic | Club Brugge Kv |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Antwerp | Statistic | Club Brugge Kv |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Antwerp | Statistic | Club Brugge Kv |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.